Health, Firefighter, Consumer and Science Groups Seek Ban on Household Products With Toxic Chemical Flame Retardants
97% of U.S. residents at risk from toxic organohalogen flame retardants in their bodies
Washington, D.C. — Today, a broad coalition of health, firefighter, consumer and science groups filed a petition asking the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) to ban four categories of consumer products—children’s products, furniture, mattresses and the casings around electronics—if they contain any flame retardant in the chemical class known as organohalogens. Petitioners include the American Academy of Pediatrics, the National Hispanic Medical Association, the International Association of Fire Fighters, the Learning Disabilities Association of America, Consumers Union, Consumer Federation of America, the League of United Latin American Citizens, Worksafe, Dr. Philip J. Landrigan and the Green Science Policy Institute.
Workplace safety is one of the core issues of concern for the thousands of refinery workers who went on strike February 1 at plants in Texas, California, Washington, and Kentucky. The workers are members of the United Steelworkers (USW), and say their employers— LyondellBasell, Marathon Oil, and Royal Dutch Shell—put lives at risk with excessive work hours, delayed maintenance, and production pressure. Their previous contract was negotiated and approved in 2012.
“Union members believe it is time to take a stand,” USW spokesperson Lynn Hancock told the Houston Chronicle. “If we don’t, our people will continue to get injured and killed on the job.” The last time there was a walk-out of this magnitude by the USW was 1980.
Today, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) released preliminary data on the number of work-related fatalities for 2013; final figures are due out next spring. While the overall trend nationwide indicates both a lower number of deaths (4,405) and rate of fatal incidents (3.2 per 100/000 workers) compared to 2012 figures, California moved in the opposite direction: more workers killed and a startling increase in deaths among Latino workers.
The preliminary number of deaths for California in 2012 was 339, which was later revised up to 375; the preliminary figure for 2013 is already at 385 deaths. We can reasonably expect the final count to surpass 400.
On April 15, 2013, 26-year-old temporary worker David Eleidjian never came home from his job at a Bay Point industrial manufacturing facility. The Iraq war veteran and recent father was caught and pulled into an unguarded spinning shaft, and died later at the hospital.
Four days later, in Santa Rosa, 21-year-old Hugo Tapia also left for his temp work position, at the glass company his father had worked at for decades. He too never returned. Only two weeks into the job, he was crushed by heavy, unsecured glass that fell off an A-frame rack.
In October, amid the tensions of a BART strike brought on in part by concerns over worker safety, BART employee Chris Sheppard and consultant Laurence Daniels were inspecting a dip in the tracks near the Walnut Creek station. They were struck and killed by a train on a maintenance run, driven by a student trainee likely being instructed in the event of a prolonged strike.
On September 4, 2013, Ellen Widess resigned from her position as Chief of the Division of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH), also known as Cal/OSHA. Worksafe and many of our allies among unions, worker centers, and OSH professionals were caught off guard by the news; even more startling was the characterization of the OSH community’s reaction by the Cal-OSHA Reporter, which claimed that “both employer and labor representatives were practically jubilant at the news.” Worksafe was the only organization that was quoted on the record; we praised her work in carrying out the mission of the agency: to protect the health and safety of California workers.
A little more than a week later, the Cal-OSHA Reporter printed a handful of letters from agency staff, worker advocate organizations, and OSH professionals who supported her record and chastised the publication for its biased reporting. The Cal-OSHA Reporter mentioned in passing but did not print any of the letters from organized labor. Her detractors remain unidentified.
Workers Memorial Day Event in Oakland Honors Those Who Died at Work in 2012: Event and annual report mark the 26th anniversary of Workers Memorial Day in the United States
Oakland, CA – Eva Macias thrived for 13 years working at the San Leandro Waste Management recycling and transfer plant. On June 18, 2012, she was hit by a front-end loader and killed. Overly informal driving rules, insufficient training, and lack of a traffic control system were to blame, according to Cal/OSHA.
46-year-old Anita Paratley was one of more than 12 female San Francisco firefighters in the Richmond district to be diagnosed with breast cancer. She began to wonder if her work was related. “When you don’t see the heat and the smoke dies down, you think you’re safe,” she says. But, the process of cleaning up and checking for hot spots after the fire takes several hours, and all the while, workers are exposed to hazardous gases and soot as materials smolder.Read more...
Federal report finds major flaws in state’s retaliation enforcement program
Incomplete and sloppy investigations leave workers without protection
Oakland, CA – Federal OSHA’s long-awaited audit of California’s “State Whistleblower Program,” housed in the Division of Labor Standards and Enforcement (DLSE), was released today. Its findings confirm what many suspected, and what low-wage workers who object to unsafe, unhealthy working conditions know all too well: that problems with the Division’s handling of employer retaliation complaints, previously identified by Worksafe and others, remain endemic in California workplaces.
“The lack of an effective, reliable enforcement system compounds the chilling effect that retaliation has on workers,” said Jora Trang, Worksafe Managing Attorney. “If you can’t voice concerns, there’s little chance you can exert any of your other rights in the workplace.”
Worksafe and SoCalCOSH release new report for Workers Memorial Day 2012: “Dying at work in California: The hidden stories behind the numbers”
On October 12, 2011, 16-year-old Armando Ramirez and his 22-year-old brother Heladio were cleaning out a storm water drain at a recycling facility. Heladio saw his brother collapse and went down the eight-foot hole to save him. Without proper protection, the brothers died from breathing hydrogen sulfide.
A telecommunications technician for 30 years, Brent Robinson was out sick most of the week before September 2. He returned to work outdoors in sweltering 100-105° heat and again felt ill. His request to go home was denied, and he died at a grocery store waiting for medical personnel.
These and other stories are profiled in "Dying at Work in California: The Hidden Stories Behind the Numbers." Produced by Worksafe and the Southern California Coalition for Occupational Safety and Health (SoCalCOSH), it will be released in advance of Workers Memorial Day, April 28, 2012.
- Report available for download: Click here -Read more...
Court to Hear Challenge to Cancer-Causing Pesticide Methyl Iodide
California officials approved pesticide over warnings from state and independent scientists
What: Court trial on cancer-causing methyl iodide
Who: Attorneys for environmental, health and farmworker groups, attorneys for pesticide maker Arysta, attorneys representing the California Department of Pesticide Regulation, farmworkers potentially affected by pesticide drift, and other plaintiffs in the lawsuit.
When: 9am Thursday, January 12 (note* the trial could last up to four hours. Key spokespersons for groups challenging methyl iodide will be available to media after the hearing either by phone or in person on the steps of the courthouse).
Where: Alameda County Administration Building, 1221 Oak Street, 3rd Floor, Room/Dept. 24, Oakland
Why: Methyl iodide causes late term miscarriages, is a known carcinogen, and puts California’s scarce groundwater supplies at risk of contamination. The pesticide poses the most direct risks to farmworkers and neighboring communities because of the volume that would be applied to fields and its tendency to drift off-site through the air.